This is a clip from episode 505 of "The Atheist Experience" TV show Watch the TV show at www.atheist-experience.com
GD Star Rating
loading...
loading...
Religious Joke - Christian Kittens vs Atheist Kittens
Previous post: IMG_6188
Next post: Cat That Loves Massages
{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }
@theaccousticaddict What do you mean my own wrong way? All you have done is defined the ‘turn the other cheek’ message, yet I have proposed a clear contradiction in message and you have ignored it, and say I AM IGNORANT??? Please….
@theaccousticaddict Ig you bother to look at google you would realise there are many recent reports that indicate it to be natural. If it’s a choice, how can an animal do it? Furthermore the reason it exists is in certain species it can create strong bonds and can also save food supplies and overpopulation (a gay animal won’t have kids). As for all that stuff about making bowel control impossible, none of my gay friends have had trouble that I know of.
@theaccousticaddict You’re right, that isn’t correct, mainly because you misread and misquoted me. I never said it was ‘always’ acceptable but it HAS been during certain times. The irony is, you haven’t studied your history well and all it takes is a google search, even if you bothered looking at the ‘history’ article of pedophilia on wikipedia. Look up ‘Pederasty’ and you can see what I mean
@kly45 “If one slaps you, turn the other cheek” Is the same thing as saying “If someone abuses you once?, bless him twice, and if someone says “you are stupid” to you once, say to that person “May God bless you twice”, bless your enemies, that’s what the bible says, for God makes rain fall on both good and bad and he also makes the sun shine down on both the good and the bad. The problem is that you guys just interpret the bible your own wrong way, and then blame it on the bible.
@kly45 No sir homosexuality is not natural, i dont know who is feeding you with this lies, anal sex is not natural, the anus is for the disposal of unwanted faecal matter from the body, using it for sexual purposes is wrong and an abomination to man and God. Are you going to tell me that homosexual anal sex is right and natural? forcing the penis into the anus weakens the anal muscles, making bowel control impossible, are you still going to tell me that that is natural???
@kly45 “It has always been acceptable in the past for men to have relationships with younger men” that sir is not correct, that is a paedophilia behaviour, in time past, people where either burned to slaughtered to death for practising such behaviour, its only now in the 21st century that such things are being taken likely. Please study you history very well, anyone who told you that homosexuality was accepted in time past is only lying to you.
@theaccousticaddict But morals always change. It has been acceptable in the past for men to have relationships with young men. I would also argue some contradictions in the bible being; ‘turn the other cheek’ and ‘an eye for an eye’. I would also say that not allowing homosexuals the same rights as straight people (Bible calls it an abomination) to be not very moral – especially as it’s natural
@MrLittletomdj Although I do disagree with theaccousticaddict, because I believe morals evolved as through all animals and it is not taught. Because we are pact animals, we know causing harm to someone in society is bad for society and thus should be avoided
@MrLittletomdj Not true, it doesn’t explain why a wolf won’t kill off an innocent cub in the pact, because they have no concept of a moral code. Bear in mind that all beings are capable of immense acts of cruelty. I never tore wings off a butterfly when I was a child. And most people that are caught doing that at early ages have a connection with becoming murderers when they’re older. So it is a corruption that is already in their brain.
@theaccousticaddict Children are capable of immense acts of cruelty. e.g. Children will tear the wings off butterflys. They have no sense of moral code until it is taught to them by thier parents. Morality is a human construct that has evolved with society.
@theaccousticaddict so children who do wrong know its wrong before they get told its wrong and if so why do they ask why? you know the why can’t i do that? sort of question
@9CrystalDragon2 No, wrong and right is not determined by how one is raised and the environment, we all have conscience, this conscience is the thing that God has put in us to help us justify what is right and what is wrong.
@theaccousticaddict also about right and wrong i believe its determined by how you are raised and the enviroment your in thats why peoples opinions may differ such as some people may say its wrong to steal while some may say its alright if its to feed yourself and your family. also children do bad things such as hitting another child to get a toy, then the parent comes along says its wrong and gives a small punishment such as made to sit on the stairs and the child learns not to do that.
@theaccousticaddict altho other people believe in their religion just as much as you and would say the same thing as you, are you saying they don’t have any spirituality because they chose a different religion than you
Arkalius80, You get back here! Arkalius, I’m not finished with you yet!!
I did not insult you, which is why I added, “No Offense”, so that you won’t take the route that you took, but you took it, anyway.
“Creepy, slimy lawyer” means a lawyer who would defend an intruder who broke into somebodys house to steal stuff, got hurt in the process, and wants to collect money from his victim. That was all I was saying. You want to defend obvious ridiculousness.
But, okay, fine. Good-bye.
@9CrystalDragon2 If you had even the basic knowledge of spirituality, you,d be able to determine that which is the right or wrong religion. Its like how our conscience lets us know that which is right and which is wrong.
@ZebrasFirst I explained why the statements you claimed contradict actually don’t. Instead of responding to my explanation you’ve decided to insult me. Goodbye.
Arkalius80, Now you’re talking in crazy circles. Didn’t you read my last post fully? I had said let us pretend that we were both atheists for a moment. How on Earth would that mean I believed the Moon “was a result of the intent of some consciousness”, if we pretended I was an atheist, too? Sheesh!!
You argue like a creepy, slimey lawyer. (No offense)
@ZebrasFirst The issue here is that you see a contradiction where I do not. The fact that the moon has important and identifiable effects does not mean it has a purpose. When I said “they simply exist” I was saying that their existence came about naturally, and not as the result of the intent of some consciousness. It was not meant to indicate they do not affect anything. What something actually does, and what it was intended to do can be (and this case is) different.
Arkalius80, Okay, let’s pretend you and I are both atheists. Your comments STILL contradict:
“Planets serve no purpose, they simply exist.”
vs
“I don’t deny that the moon has effects on the Earth. I don’t deny these effects are indeed important for human existence.”
I would have more respect for you if you admit misposting or was in error for saying the first comment. You and I, and the rest of the public who stumble on this will know you’re dead wrong.
@pnate70 and if either of any of the other religions are right then your going to hell with the athiests…. now is that worth the risk
@ZebrasFirst Are you being disingenuous, or are you just thick? I was trying to illustrate by example that the fact that just because a beneficial and improbable event occurs, it is not evidence that there was someone shifting the odds in our favor. The fact that we exist against all odds is not evidence that the odds were modified in our favor by someone
@ZebrasFirst You continuously fail to comprehend what I’m saying. I don’t deny that the moon has effects on the Earth. I don’t deny that these effects are indeed important for human existence. The point is that there is no evidence to suggest that what the moon does is somehow intended by someone or something. It is the product of a specific causal chain of natural and mostly well-understood processes– essentially happenstance, not providence, unless you have evidence to the contrary.
Arkalius80, HA, HA, HA!!! Are you comparing the Moon’s affect on the Earth’s ocean tides to the lottery and pregnant women?!! Wow, you ARE something special.
Arkalius80, Martha Stewart’s catch phrase used to be, “It’s A Good Thing”. And you said it, and it made me think of her.
Oh my goodness…Here we go again and again in a never-ending circle. Let me summarize it like this (again):
“Planets serve no purpose, they simply exist.”
“And yes I know that about the moon.” (Referring to the Moon’s affect’s on the Earth’s ocean tides)
Somebody’s lying…
You must log in to post a comment.